Skip to content

UFC Fight Night: Cortes Acosta vs. Walker · 7 Nov 2026, 22:00 · scheduled

Priscila Cachoeira vs Nina Milosevic

Priscila Cachoeira 16%84% Nina Milosevic

Probability of winning, given a decisive result (draws / no contests excluded)

Model logistic-regression · generated 2 Nov 2026, 21:51 · data completeness 90%

⚠ Limited evidence: at least one fighter has fewer than 3 prior UFC bouts in the data, so this forecast is less reliable.

Main statistical drivers (associations, not causes)
  1. age favours Nina Milosevic
  2. Elo rating gap favours Nina Milosevic
  3. strikes absorbed favours Nina Milosevic

Model accuracy is measured on Model Lab. It is currently behind the bookmaker consensus, so a gap between the two is more likely the model’s than an opportunity.

Odds Intelligence

Research benchmark only. Bookmaker prices never feed the prediction model.

AI prediction · logistic-regression
Priscila Cachoeira 16% · Nina Milosevic 84%
Bookmaker consensus · 12 bookmakers
Priscila Cachoeira 22% · Nina Milosevic 78%
Updated 77 min ago
AI versus market
−5.9 pp for Priscila Cachoeira
Percentage points. A disagreement, not a tip.

Bookmakers

Bookmaker ↑Priscila CachoeiraNina MilosevicUpdated
888sport4.501.2077 min ago
BetAnything3.851.2278 min ago
BetOnline.ag4.501.2277 min ago
Betsson4.351.2077 min ago
Betway4.331.2277 min ago
Coolbet4.411.2377 min ago
Grosvenor3.851.1277 min ago
LiveScore Bet4.351.2177 min ago
Nordic Bet4.401.2177 min ago
Pinnacle5.011.1977 min ago
Unibet (UK)4.201.2077 min ago
Virgin Bet4.351.2177 min ago

Market movement

Not enough history in this range (1 point). History is collected from now on; none is back-filled.

Shows Priscila Cachoeira’s consensus probability. First observed price is not the bookmaker’s opening price, and the last captured price is not the official closing price.

Head to head

MeasurePriscila CachoeiraNina Milosevic
UFC record since 20135-9-01-0-0
Height (cm)170.18165.1
Reach (cm)165.1170.18
StanceOrthodoxOrthodox

“—” means the source did not supply the value. It is not zero.

Forecast revisions

  • first · 2 Nov 2026, 21:51 · logistic-regression
  • latest · 2 Nov 2026, 21:51 · logistic-regression